Skip to main content
European Commission logo
European School Education Platform
TwinSpace | TwinSpace

Ardubots RACE - Robotics Arduino Challenge in Europe

Pages

Evaluation form 2

Created by Nataša Majstrović
Last updated by Jean-Noel PEDEUTOUR 1 year 3 months ago

1_13.png
2_9.png
3_4.png
4_6.png
5_3.png
6_5.png
7_4.png
8_3.png
9_1.png
10_1.png

 

Analysis of the results

69% of the students have not participated in eTwinning projects before. 

The majority of students rated their knowledge of robotics as Average or Poor. This suggests that the project had a diverse group of students with varying levels of prior knowledge in robotics.

The comparison indicates a significant improvement in students' self-rated knowledge of robotics. Initially, a large portion of students rated their knowledge as Average or Poor. After the project, most students felt their knowledge had improved to Good, with a notable increase in those rating their knowledge as Excellent. This suggests the project effectively enhanced the student's understanding and skills in robotics.

The comparison shows a remarkable improvement in the students' self-rated knowledge of working with Arduino. Initially, a significant portion of students rated their knowledge as Average, Poor, or Very Poor, indicating a lack of confidence or experience. However, after completing the project, the majority of students (65.5%) rated their knowledge as Good, and a substantial number (20.7%) rated it as Excellent. This suggests that the project was highly effective in enhancing the students' skills and confidence in working with Arduino.

The majority of students rated the collaboration positively. This indicates that most students found the collaboration within their mixed groups to be effective and satisfactory. However, 24.1% of students rated it as 3, suggesting that there is still some room for improvement. By focusing on enhancing communication and cooperation strategies within mixed groups, the overall collaborative experience for all participants can be further improved.

The majority of students were highly satisfied with the project. This indicates that most students found the project to be very satisfactory and beneficial. However, 31% of students rated their satisfaction as 3, and a small minority (3.4%) rated it as 2, suggesting that while the overall response is positive, there are some areas where improvements could be made to increase overall satisfaction.

The majority of students expressed a strong willingness to participate in a similar project again in the future. This suggests a high level of satisfaction and engagement with the current project, as well as a positive perception of the value and benefits derived from it.

 

Do you have any additional comments or feedback about the project?

"Learning robotics is easier when you do it practically. It is like a chemical experiment. You learn something when you try it. By analyzing the results of execution of program code you learn what needs improvements. I appreciate the freedom of making robots your way and not just repeating other's work. It boosts creativity of future programmers and encourages them to continue developing software."

"The project has been very usefull for improving comunication skill and the knowledge of STEM area."