Objective

Evaluate the project

Instructions for students

Answer the following questions.

Results

Analysis of the results

The general rating of the projet by the students is rather good.

The students rated the communication as average. The decision of using only the tools proposed by teachers (Miro boards and Twinspace forums) was maybe not the most suitable for students who prefer other tools.
The creativity of teams was rated as good. Indeed each found an original solution to create their robot and design tracks.

The videomeetings were rated as average. Probably, more interactivity and student's involvement should be imagined in the future.

Miro board tool was evaluated very differently by the students. Maybe not all of them understood how to use it and on which purpose.
Collaboration in forums was rated as rather good, even if not all members used it to share ideas, codes and comments. As said before, Twinspace forum is not the favorite tool for students to communicate.